According to the goat’s medical record-which was provided to the inspector five days after the inspection-its cast had fallen off two days earlier, and the only treatment was a dose of Banamine, a veterinary painkiller. enforcement action, the company denied the allegations and said, in response to the July, 2010, episode, “Unfortunately, the inspector did not observe the animal voluntarily walking to the outdoor pen to lie down in the sun, and we believe, the inspector drew a false conclusion that SCBT personnel placed the animal directly in the outdoor pen.”Ī report from April 19, 2012, describes a goat whose shin was so badly broken that the leg below it was hanging loose. would not comment on the case, but it generally inspects research institutions once or twice a year reports indicate that fourteen inspections took place at Santa Cruz Biotech between 20.) In its initial defense against the U.S.D.A. The July, 2010, report included a goat with a coyote bite that received no treatment for pain a lame goat lying in a feeder, unable to reach its food and a sick goat lying prone, in the sun, on a ninety-degree day. complaint, resulted in a citation for poor veterinary care.īetween 20, inspectors noted problems during almost every inspection. A 2007 inspection, the first of the seven included in the U.S.D.A. According to a blog post in Nature, agency inspectors found that Santa Cruz Biotech was improperly euthanizing the animals and harvesting antibodies from a thousand rabbits, despite telling the Department of Agriculture that it had just eighty. began in the mid-aughts, when the company paid forty-six hundred dollars in fines for twenty-three citations received between 20. Santa Cruz Biotechnology’s string of troubles with the U.S.D.A. Down the road, they keep ten thousand goats and six thousand rabbits to generate their product. The sloping pastures are dotted with sleek, award-winning show horses and champion Gelbvieh cattle. Santa Cruz Biotech is owned by John and Brenda Stephenson, who have spent the past fifteen years acquiring forty-four thousand hilly acres along California’s central coast, in hopes of restoring the historic San Juan Ranch to its former peak of nearly sixty thousand acres. to file an enforcement action, in 2012, accusing Santa Cruz Biotechnology of willful violation of the Animal Welfare Act a hearing was recently set for July. Years of problematic reports, including issues ranging from documentation troubles to animals in extreme distress, led the U.S.D.A. 11765 was not the only animal owned by Santa Cruz Biotech to meet a grim fate. Its extensive catalogue is in high demand: according to a 2012 survey by The Scientist, fifty-three per cent of labs work with antibodies acquired from the company. 11675, is the second-largest vendor in the billion-dollar antibody market. Santa Cruz Biotechnology, which owned Goat No.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |